1

Get started today

Schedule Your Free Consultation Today!

Fill out the form and someone from our team will contact you. 

    Call Now Open 24/7

    Free Consultation

    personal injury lawyers in chicago

    The Federal Rules of Evidence: Hearsay

    OVER $1 BILLION IN RECOVERIES FOR OUR CLIENTS

    The hearsay objection is one of the most common objections used in practice. Both the Federal Rules of Evidence and Nevada Revised Statutes contain similar guidelines regarding hearsay, which is defined as “an out-of-court statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Nevada law defines a statement as either “1) an oral or written assertion; or 2) nonverbal conduct of a person intended as an assertion.” In the context of hearsay, the declarant—the individual who made the statement—did not make the statement under oath or while affirming the truth, making it difficult to assess the truthfulness of the statement or reliability of the declarant. Essentially, the reasoning behind hearsay objections is that courts prefer firsthand reports over secondhand reports. The risk of faulty perception, unreliable memory, lack of clarity, and untruthfulness increases with secondhand testimony. Secondhand reports also eliminate a factfinder’s ability to cross-examine the original speaker, preventing them from viewing the speaker’s demeanor and assessing the credibility of these reports.

    While courts generally prefer firsthand reports over secondhand reports, there are situations in which secondhand reports are considered reliable. The Federal Rules of Evidence describe four categories in which hearsay may be admissible, which are fairly mirrored by the admissible hearsay exceptions under Nevada law.

    Generally, in greater regard to the Federal Rules of Evidence, hearsay exceptions fall under one of the following categories: 1) Either prior statements by the witnesses or statements made by opposing parties; 2) situations in which the declarant is unavailable to testify in court; 3) exceptions in relation to excited utterances, present sense impressions, state of mind, medical treatment, recorded recollection, business records, public records, or other exceptions under Federal Rule 803; or 4) a residual hearsay exception under Federal Rule 807. The purpose of these categories of hearsay exceptions is to permit the admission of statements or documents that are highly reliable, despite being made out-of-court to prove the truth of the matter.

    Thanks to the Las Vegas, NV personal injury lawyers at Eglet Adams for their insight on hearsay as it pertains to the Federal Rules of Evidence.

    Read More

    Follow Us

    #LARRYWINS

    workers compensation attorneys in dc

    The Disparti Law Group is one of the most successful law firms serving the greater Chicago and Tampa areas. As the leader in Injury, Disability, Workers’ Comp, and Employment Law, with more than $1 Billion in recoveries, The Disparti Law Group has been named One of the Most Influential Law Firms in America by Trial Lawyer Magazine.

    Practice Areas

    FREE CASE CONSULTATION

      Recent Posts

      CLIENT REVIEWS

      Was a great fit for me and would definitely recommend to family and friends!

       – Christine

      It has been a wonderful experience working with Disparti Law Group. They are highly recommended.

      John

      I feel you guys did a great job in handling my case.

      V. Gentry

      Very professional staff, great experience.

      Lisa

      Why Choose Us

      CONTACT LARRY

      FREE CASE EVALUATION

      YOU WON'T PAY A PENNY UNTIL LARRY WINS

        TAMPA

        1041 U.S. Highway 19
        Holiday, FL 34691
        727-600-6000

        CHICAGO

        121 W Wacker Drive, Suite 2300
        Chicago, IL 60601
        312-600-6000