Standing Up Against Workplace Discrimination
Disparti Law Group Heads to Federal Appeals Court
At Disparti Law Group, we believe every worker deserves to feel safe, respected, and valued on the job. Unfortunately, not every workplace lives up to that basic standard. When employers look the other way in the face of harassment or discrimination, the consequences for employees can be devastating — and that’s where we step in.
Recently, attorney Arvin Hosseini argued a major case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, one of the most influential appellate courts in the country. The case involves serious allegations of racial and sexual harassment within a unit at the Cook County Sheriff’s Office. The outcome of this case could have a lasting impact not just on our client, but also on how public employers across the region handle hostile work environments in the future.
What Is a Hostile Work Environment?
Before diving into the case, it helps to understand what lawyers mean by a hostile work environment. In simple terms, the law says that workers have the right to do their jobs without being harassed because of their race, gender, religion, or other protected characteristics.
A hostile work environment occurs when discrimination is so severe or so persistent that it changes the conditions of employment. For example, if an employee hears racial slurs on a regular basis, or if sexist comments make it impossible to feel respected or safe at work, that employee is not experiencing just “bad behavior” — they may be facing a civil rights violation.
Employers are legally required to step in and stop harassment once they know it’s happening. If they don’t, they can be held responsible in court.
The Case Against the Sheriff’s Office
Our client, a dedicated employee within the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, came forward with disturbing allegations about conditions inside their unit. According to the complaint, the unit was rife with offensive language, including repeated use of the most derogatory of all terms.
Even more troubling, the Sheriff’s Office was put on notice about this toxic environment but failed to take meaningful action for many months. When the office finally did act, the hostile atmosphere allegedly continued.
For any employee, showing up to work in an environment like this can be emotionally draining and deeply harmful. No one should be forced to choose between their paycheck and their dignity.
Taking the Fight to the Federal Appeals Court
This case has now reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which reviews cases from Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. An appeal is not about re-trying the case from scratch — it’s about deciding whether the law was applied correctly.
On behalf of our client, attorney Arvin Hosseini argued that the Sheriff’s Office failed in its duty to protect employees from a racially and sexually discriminatory environment. They presented evidence that the harassment was not isolated or accidental, but part of a years-long pattern that management ignored.
The judges of the Seventh Circuit have now taken the case under advisement, which means they are carefully reviewing the arguments and evidence. A written decision will likely come in the months ahead.
Standing Up for What’s Right
Legal arguments and court decisions are important, but at the heart of this case are the clients who simply wanted to do their job without facing slurs and harassment. Imagine walking into work every day knowing you’ll hear degrading language, or knowing that your supervisors won’t protect you.
That kind of environment doesn’t just make it hard to focus — it takes a toll on mental health, self-esteem, and even physical well-being. Many workers in hostile environments feel trapped: they need the paycheck, but the job comes at the cost of their dignity. That’s exactly why laws against discrimination exist, and why attorneys like ours fight to enforce them.
This case is just one example of how Disparti Law Group stands up for workers’ rights. Our firm has a long history of fighting for people who have been treated unfairly by employers, whether through discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
We believe that taking on powerful institutions — from large corporations to government offices — is necessary to level the playing field. Every case we handle is more than just a legal battle; it’s an opportunity to bring about positive change for our clients and for workplaces across the region.
Looking Ahead
The Seventh Circuit’s decision in this case will be closely watched. No matter the outcome, Disparti Law Group remains committed to fighting for justice and equality in the workplace.
If you believe you are facing harassment or discrimination at work, know that you don’t have to endure it in silence. Speaking up is never easy, but with the right legal team on your side, you can protect your rights and demand accountability.
Discrimination has no place in any workplace — whether in a small business or in a major public office. When those in power fail to act, it takes courage from individuals and strong advocacy from attorneys to bring the truth to light.
At Disparti Law Group, we are proud of our attorneys Arvin Hosseini and Cass T. Casper for standing up in federal court to demand justice on behalf of our client. We look forward to the Seventh Circuit’s decision in the months ahead, and we will continue to fight every day to make workplaces safer, fairer, and more inclusive.
Navigating the Social Security Disability Application Process
Applying for Social Security Disability (SSD) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits is never easy. The process is complex, time-consuming, and often frustrating—especially when you receive a denial. And it seems like everyone gets denied. That’s because nearly 70% of all initial applications for SSD or SSI benefits are denied. But that doesn’t mean you should give up or stop trying. In fact, it just means that you have to consider retaining an attorney to help out.
At Disparti Law Group, we’ve seen firsthand how important it is to have a knowledgeable disability law firm guiding you through each step. Our team of attorneys, case managers, medical experts and more work together to turn your denial into an approval.
If you are applying for benefits, it’s helpful to understand how the system works. This guide has been written to take you through the application process.
Step 1: Initial Application
Most applicants start by filing an application directly with the Social Security Administration (SSA). Unfortunately, the majority of claims are denied at this stage (65-70%), often because medical records are incomplete, the application was filled out wrong, or the SSA believes the applicant could still work. If a client comes to us at this phase, we can help organize the evidence, avoid common mistakes, and present your case in the strongest possible way. This will often result in getting you the benefits you deserve quickly.
Step 2: Reconsideration
When an initial claim is denied, the next step is reconsideration. A different examiner reviews your file, but statistically, most applicants are denied again. Here, a shocking 85-90% of applications are denied again. At this point, it’s even more important to have a specialized attorney involved to develop additional medical evidence and strengthen your arguments.
Step 3: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Hearing
This next step could be the best chance to convert a denial into an approval. It involves preparing your case and presenting it to an Administrative Law Judge.
An Administrative Law Judge is an independent judge who works for the Social Security Administration but is not part of the team that initially reviewed your application. The ALJ’s job is to take a fresh look at your case, review all the medical records, listen to testimony from you and any witnesses, and decide whether you qualify for benefits under the law. This hearing is often the best chance for applicants to win, because it’s the first time you’re able to present your story in person and have an attorney argue on your behalf.
This is where a lawyer’s role becomes crucial. An attorney can:
- Gather and present supporting medical records,
- Question witnesses or medical experts, and
- More persuasively explain to the judge why you meet SSA’s definition of disability.
Many successful cases are won at this stage, but preparation is key.
Step 4: Appeals Council
If the ALJ denies your claim, the next level is the Appeals Council, which reviews whether the judge made legal or factual errors. The possible outcomes are:
- Denied Review (80–85%) – The Appeals Council refuses to review the case, so the ALJ’s decision stands.
- Remand (10–15%) – The case is sent back to an ALJ for another hearing.
- Favorable Decision (1–2%) – In rare cases, the Appeals Council issues its own favorable decision.
These numbers show just how difficult it is to succeed at this stage—fewer than 1 in 100 claimants will have the Appeals Council itself award benefits. That’s why it is essential to have an attorney who understands how to preserve appeal issues and build a strong record early in the process. While difficult it is still possible for a win.
Most of the time, when we have a strong case and get in front of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), we’re able to show that our client qualifies for benefits. But sometimes, even valid claims are denied—and that can be incredibly frustrating for the people relying on these benefits. One client came to us with a clear case, only to be denied at the initial application and again at reconsideration. In the summer of 2024, we finally presented the case before an ALJ, and once again, the application was denied. We refused to give up. We filed an appeal with the Appeals Council, and in August 2025, the client finally received a fully favorable decision. The joy and relief our client felt that day reminded us why we fight so hard: to ensure that those who truly need benefits don’t have to face this journey alone.
Why Legal Representation Matters
The disability benefits system is stacked against applicants. Denials are common, deadlines are strict, and the rules are complicated. But you don’t have to face this alone. Our attorneys focus on Social Security disability law, and we know how to navigate the system, anticipate challenges, and fight for the best possible outcome.
Don’t wait until you’ve been denied multiple times to seek help. Having a reputable, specialized disability attorney from the beginning can dramatically improve your chances of success—whether at the initial application, during a hearing, or on appeal.
Disparti Law is committed to turning denials into paychecks and helping clients get the benefits they deserve.
Proving Liability In Pedestrian Accident Lawsuits
Pedestrian accidents often result in significant injuries and financial challenges, leaving victims and their families uncertain about how to move forward with recovery. One of the most important aspects of these cases is proving liability. Establishing who is legally responsible often determines the outcome of a claim and the compensation available. As we look at how liability is proven in these lawsuits, it is important to understand the process and the evidence that plays a key role. If you or a loved one has been involved in such an accident, working with a Chicago, IL pedestrian accident lawyer may make a significant difference in protecting your rights.
Evidence That Supports Liability
The foundation of any pedestrian accident case is evidence. Police reports, medical records, photographs of the accident scene, and witness statements all help build a picture of what happened. In some cases, traffic camera footage or data from nearby businesses can be used to support a claim. The goal is to establish whether the driver acted negligently, such as by speeding, ignoring traffic signals, or being distracted at the time of the crash.
Establishing Negligence
Proving negligence requires showing that the driver owed a duty of care to the pedestrian, that this duty was breached, and that the breach directly caused the injuries. Drivers have a responsibility to follow traffic laws and operate their vehicles safely. When they fail to do so, the legal system allows pedestrians to hold them accountable. By linking a driver’s actions to the injuries sustained, liability becomes clearer.
How Comparative Fault May Apply
In Illinois, the modified comparative fault rule applies, meaning a pedestrian’s compensation can be reduced if they are found to share some responsibility for the accident. For example, if a pedestrian crossed outside of a designated crosswalk, this factor may be considered when determining liability. However, if the driver was primarily at fault, the pedestrian may still recover damages. This legal framework makes it even more important to have strong evidence supporting the claim.
The Importance Of Legal Representation
These cases often involve communication with insurance companies, medical providers, and sometimes opposing attorneys. Having legal support can help victims stay focused on recovery while their case is handled professionally. At Disparti Law, we offer free consultations to evaluate cases and determine the best course of action. In addition, our team has experience handling pedestrian accident claims specifically within Illinois, giving us the knowledge needed to build strong cases for our clients.
Moving Forward With Support You Can Trust
Showing liability in pedestrian accident cases depends on a thorough review of the evidence, the law, and the particular facts involved. Having the right support can make a meaningful difference in both the outcome of a claim and the recovery process. At Disparti Law Group, we are committed to protecting the rights of injured pedestrians and helping families secure the compensation they deserve. If you have been affected by a pedestrian accident, contact us today to discuss your case with a dedicated attorney.
Statutes Of Limitation In Wrongful Death Lawsuits
The death of a loved one because of another party’s negligence is an especially difficult burden for families. While no amount of compensation can replace what has been lost, wrongful death lawsuits provide a legal avenue for holding responsible parties accountable. One of the most important factors in these cases is the statute of limitation, which sets the deadline for filing a claim. Missing this deadline can mean losing the ability to pursue justice, which is why families need to understand how it works. To get timely guidance, many families seek help from a Chicago, IL wrongful death lawyer.
What A Statute Of Limitation Means
A statute of limitation is a legal deadline for filing a lawsuit. In wrongful death cases, this period is designed to protect the fairness of the legal process by requiring claims to be filed while evidence is still available and memories are fresh. Once the statute expires, the court can dismiss the claim, regardless of its merits.
For wrongful death cases, the timeframe varies by state. In Illinois, the general rule is that families must file within two years of the person’s death. However, there may be exceptions depending on the facts of the case, such as situations involving medical malpractice or cases where a government entity is at fault.
Why Timing Is So Important
Acting within the statute of limitation is more than a procedural requirement—it is a critical step toward preserving the right to compensation. Families often need financial support for funeral costs, lost income, and other related expenses. Delays in filing can jeopardize access to this support, leaving families without the resources they need during an already difficult time.
Meeting the deadline also helps ensure that witnesses, medical records, and other evidence are available. These pieces of information can be harder to obtain as time passes, which may weaken a case. Filing promptly allows families and their attorneys to build a stronger foundation for their claim.
Support Families Can Rely On
The process of pursuing a wrongful death lawsuit can add stress for families already facing heartache. That is why having a team that focuses on providing clear guidance is so important. At Disparti Law, families not only receive legal representation but also support in managing the practical challenges that follow a sudden loss. The firm offers free consultations to help families determine whether they have a case and provides services on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients only pay if compensation is recovered. This approach allows families to pursue justice without worrying about upfront legal costs.
Factors That May Affect The Deadline
While Illinois generally applies a two-year statute of limitation, certain factors may shorten or extend that deadline. For example, when the defendant is a government body, a shorter filing period may apply, sometimes requiring notice within one year. On the other hand, if the wrongful act is not discovered until later, the clock may start at the time of discovery rather than the date of death.
These nuances highlight why families should not wait to seek legal advice. Even if they believe they have plenty of time, unique circumstances could impact the actual deadline. Acting early gives families more flexibility and protects their ability to move forward with a claim.
Moving Forward With Legal Guidance
Statutes of limitation play a key role in wrongful death cases, and knowing how they work is vital to protecting the rights of families who are already grieving. By acting within the required timeframe, families give themselves the best chance to pursue accountability and secure the resources they need. For those who have lost a loved one, seeking guidance right away is one of the most important steps to take. Disparti Law Group is here to provide that support and representation. Contact us today to discuss your case and learn how we can help.
How Medical Bills Are Covered In Rideshare Accident Cases
Rideshare services are now a common way to get around, but accidents involving these vehicles often leave people uncertain about how medical expenses will be covered. After an injury, hospital bills, physical therapy, and ongoing treatment can add up quickly. Victims often wonder who is responsible for covering these expenses—the driver, the rideshare company, or their own insurance. Sorting through coverage options can be stressful, which is why having the right legal guidance matters. For those injured in the area, working with a Chicago, IL rideshare accident lawyer can make a difference in how these claims are handled.
Insurance Coverage Through The Rideshare Company
One of the main factors in rideshare accident cases is whether the driver was logged into the app and actively working at the time of the crash. If the driver was not logged in, their personal auto insurance usually applies. However, when the driver is online and waiting for a ride request, limited liability coverage is generally available through the rideshare company. Once a ride is accepted or a passenger is in the car, higher coverage levels often apply, which may include up to $1 million in liability insurance for injuries and medical costs.
How Personal Insurance May Apply
In some situations, an injured person’s own auto insurance or health insurance may step in first. Medical payment coverage or personal injury protection policies can help cover hospital visits and treatment, regardless of fault. These benefits can provide important support while liability is still being determined, especially if the rideshare company or driver disputes responsibility. Still, these coverages are often limited, and many people require additional compensation to cover the full scope of their medical needs.
Seeking Compensation Through A Legal Claim
If insurance coverage does not fully address the medical expenses, filing a legal claim may be necessary. A claim can pursue compensation not only for direct medical bills but also for future treatment and therapy. Victims may also be able to recover costs tied to missed work and the impact of injuries on daily life. In these cases, gathering medical records, bills, and statements from providers is critical in building a strong claim.
How Legal Representation Supports Recovery
Working through the process with insurance companies and rideshare corporations can be stressful. Having legal representation means someone is working to protect our rights and pursue the compensation we deserve. At Disparti Law, we assist clients by handling communication with insurers, collecting evidence, and building a claim that reflects the full impact of an accident. Our team also provides guidance about how different insurance coverages interact so clients have a clear path forward.
Protecting Your Health And Financial Future
Without proper support, medical bills from rideshare accidents can quickly pile up. That is why it is important to understand how insurance policies, rideshare coverage, and personal options may overlap. At Disparti Law Group, we have experience working with individuals injured in car and rideshare accidents and we know how to pursue compensation for both immediate and long-term medical costs. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a rideshare crash, now is the time to speak with a Chicago, IL rideshare accident lawyer about your options. Call Disparti Law Group today to learn how we can help you take the next step toward recovery.
Most Dangerous Intersections In Cook County, IL
Car accidents are possible on any roadway, but certain intersections are especially hazardous because of heavy traffic, flawed layouts, or common driver mistakes. In Cook County, certain intersections have become known for higher accident rates, leading to serious injuries and significant property damage. Knowing which areas are most hazardous allows us to be more cautious as drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. For those affected by crashes at these locations, it often becomes necessary to seek the guidance of a Cook County, IL car accident lawyer.
Intersections With High Traffic Volume
Many of the most dangerous intersections are located where traffic congestion is constant. For example, Harlem Avenue and 95th Street in Oak Lawn sees steady traffic from commuters, buses, and nearby businesses. The intersection of Cicero Avenue and I-55 is another busy spot where high-speed merging traffic creates an elevated risk for collisions. With drivers rushing to beat signals or weaving through lanes, these intersections have developed reputations for frequent accidents.
Areas With Complicated Lane Changes
Another factor contributing to risk is the presence of multiple lanes that require quick or difficult changes. The intersection of North Avenue and Harlem Avenue is a well-known trouble spot, with complex lane patterns that often confuse drivers. The combination of turning lanes, heavy pedestrian crossings, and frequent commercial traffic makes this intersection particularly challenging.
Intersections With Poor Visibility
Some intersections become dangerous not just because of traffic volume, but because of reduced visibility. For example, intersections along Western Avenue near 79th Street have conditions where drivers turning left often cannot see oncoming traffic clearly until it’s too late. In these areas, the likelihood of T-bone or side-impact accidents increases significantly.
The Role Of Data In Identifying Risk
State and local traffic data reveal that Cook County regularly records more intersection-related accidents than many other parts of Illinois. By reviewing police reports and roadway safety data, patterns emerge that highlight which intersections present the most risk. This information is critical not only for drivers but also for legal professionals who must evaluate the circumstances of a crash when building a claim.
How Legal Support Can Help After An Accident
When someone is injured at one of these high-risk intersections, they may face medical bills, lost income, and the stress of recovery. At the same time, questions about liability often arise. Was the accident the result of a driver running a red light? Was the design of the intersection itself a contributing factor? These issues matter in determining the outcome of an insurance claim or lawsuit.
At our firm, we focus on helping injured individuals recover compensation for both immediate and long-term needs. In addition to pursuing financial damages, we also provide guidance on medical care resources and help clients deal with insurance adjusters. Importantly, we are committed to keeping our clients informed at every stage of their case so they never feel left out of the process.
Moving Forward With Legal Guidance
Drivers and pedestrians in Cook County face risks at intersections that cannot be completely avoided. However, when accidents do happen, it is possible to take steps toward recovery and accountability. If you or someone you love has been injured in a crash at one of these intersections, we encourage you to seek legal advice as soon as possible. The team at Disparti Law Group is available to review your situation, answer questions, and discuss possible next steps. Call today to schedule a consultation with a trusted attorney who can stand with you during this difficult time.
Rideshare Vs Standard Car Accident Liability
Rideshare accidents present unique challenges when it comes to determining liability. Unlike standard car accidents, these cases often involve multiple parties, including the rideshare driver, the rideshare company, and potentially other drivers. Our Chicago, IL rideshare accident lawyer has helped clients handle these situations, making sure that those responsible are held accountable. Our firm has achieved over $2 billion in recoveries for our clients and has been named one of the Most Influential Law Firms in America. Understanding the differences in liability between rideshare and standard vehicle accidents can make a significant difference for anyone pursuing a claim.
Parties Potentially Liable
In a standard car accident, liability is usually straightforward: the at-fault driver and their insurance company cover the damages. Rideshare accidents, however, can involve multiple layers of responsibility. Liability may fall on the rideshare driver, the rideshare company, another motorist, or a combination of these parties. Determining which entity is legally responsible requires a careful look at the circumstances, including the driver’s employment status with the rideshare company at the time of the accident and whether company policies were followed.
Insurance Differences
Insurance coverage differs noticeably between rideshare and standard car accidents. Standard car accidents typically involve personal auto insurance policies, which pay for damages when the policyholder is at fault. Rideshare accidents often involve both personal policies and commercial coverage provided by the rideshare company. Understanding which policy applies and how it responds can be challenging, especially when the driver was logged into the app but not actively transporting a passenger. Our best personal injury lawyer’s experience helps clients handle these layers efficiently, protecting their right to full compensation.
Passenger Protections
Passengers in rideshare vehicles have different protections than those in traditional cars. Rideshare companies carry commercial insurance designed to cover passengers, which may provide higher limits than standard policies. This coverage can help pay for medical bills, lost wages, and long-term care if injuries are severe. However, proving eligibility and dealing with multiple insurers often requires skilled legal guidance to make sure the compensation reflects the full extent of the damages.
Comparative Fault Considerations
Rideshare and standard car accidents both consider comparative fault, which can affect the final settlement. Rideshare cases often add additional layers because the driver, the company, and another motorist may share responsibility. Determining these percentages often involves accident reconstruction experts and reviewing detailed ride logs or surveillance footage. As Chicago’s largest personal injury firm, our team works carefully to assign fault correctly, helping clients receive the compensation they need.
Legal Options After An Accident
Victims of both rideshare and standard vehicle accidents have the right to pursue legal claims against negligent parties. In rideshare cases, claims may include personal injury suits against the driver, commercial liability claims against the company, or third-party claims if another motorist contributed to the crash. Standard car accident claims usually involve personal injury lawsuits. No matter the case, thorough investigation and strong representation give clients the best chance at fair compensation.
Choosing The Right Legal Support
At Disparti Law Group, we understand the differences between rideshare and standard car accident liability. Our team provides clear guidance and dedicated representation. We charge no fees unless we win, offer free consultations, and have a proven track record of multi-million dollar settlements. If you’ve been injured in a rideshare or standard vehicle accident, reach out to Disparti Law Group to discuss your case and explore your legal options.
Disparti Law Group Distributes Nearly 1,500 Backpacks in 2025 to Support Local Students
Since its inception, Disparti Law Group’s Project Backpack has provided more than 5,000 backpacks to students in underserved communities. What started as a small way to give back has grown into a meaningful annual tradition. This year alone, the Project Backpack Street Team rolled into four Chicago-area communities and handed out nearly 1,500 fully stocked backpacks, helping local families get ready for the school year.
Going Beyond the Backpack
With the rising costs of school supplies, the team at Disparti Law Group knew that simply giving away empty backpacks wouldn’t be enough. That’s why each backpack was hand-packed with essential items that students need to succeed in the classroom. These included:
- Folders and spiral notebooks
- Pencil cases, pens, and pencils
- Crayons, glue sticks, and scissors
- Rulers and other classroom essentials
“We want every child to feel confident and prepared on their first day of school,” said Larry Disparti, Founder of Disparti Law Group. “Each backpack is filled with the supplies students need to excel in school—not just to get by.”
Focusing on Communities That Need It Most
This year, Project Backpack made stops in Englewood, Roseland, Blue Island, and Cicero — neighborhoods where many families face financial challenges as they prepare for the new school year. By bringing the event directly to these communities, the team was able to connect with families in a meaningful, personal way.
At the 7th Annual Fernwood Park Festival, local organizer Howard Little expressed his appreciation:
“We really appreciated that the Disparti Law Group team came out to the festival to hand out backpacks,” said Little. “There is such a need in our community, and we are thankful that there are people like the team at Disparti who care about us. Thank you to Larry and his team!”
A Commitment to Giving Back
Project Backpack is just one of the many ways that Disparti Law Group works to uplift the communities they serve. Whether it’s through legal advocacy or grassroots support, the firm remains committed to helping people get the tools they need to build better futures.
As the 2025–2026 school year begins, Disparti Law Group is proud to have played a small part in helping hundreds of students feel confident, supported, and ready to learn.
DLG Supercharges Productivity Embracing Microsoft 365 and CoPilot AI
Disparti Law Group recently undertook a bold technology transformation — migrating from outdated on‑premises systems to the full Microsoft 365 platform powered by AI via Microsoft 365 Copilot. As Microsoft reported on July 7, 2025, this move has not just modernized infrastructure, but dramatically increased efficiency, collaboration, and client service outcomes across the organization (Microsoft).
The Challenge: Outdated Systems Holding Back a Client‑First Mission
Before the transformation, Disparti Law Group was managing client data via on‑premises Citrix servers and shared drives—a setup that was dated, slow, and could not keep up with its mission of exceptional client support. Attorneys and support staff often worked in downloaded versions of documents, risking version control issues and sluggish collaboration (Microsoft).
From an IT perspective, the firm relied on a managed service provider whose responsiveness was declining. Combined, these limitations hindered internal workflow and the firm was committed to finding a solution that could further improve client service delivery.
Why Microsoft 365 (and Copilot) Were a Smart Choice
Recognizing the need to modernize, Disparti turned to Microsoft 365. The firm’s leadership viewed this not just as an upgrade, but as an opportunity to enable faster, smarter collaboration and to bring AI-powered productivity into the daily business practices (Microsoft).
Microsoft 365 offers a full suite of solutions—SharePoint, Teams, Outlook, OneNote, Bookings, Power Automate, and security/compliance tools—all designed to support law‑firm workflows (Messaging Architects).
Copilot, integrated across Word, SharePoint, and Teams, was seen as a game‑changer: its generative AI enables auto‑drafts, quick summarization, faster editing, and streamlined SOP creation—all with emphasis on security and governance.
Deployment and Adoption Journey
Disparti initiated a firm‑wide rollout of Microsoft 365 and began integrating Copilot into daily routines. Key steps included:
- Migrating document storage into SharePoint, replacing legacy file shares that made collaboration slow and prone to errors (Microsoft).
- Empowering teams to co‑author and edit documents in real time, eliminating version conflicts and email exchanges.
- Rolling out Teams channels for case work, departments, and cross‑functional projects.
- Beginning training and experimentation with Copilot, especially for legal operations and intake workflows.
Results: Time Savings, Collaboration Gains, Happier Teams
a) Reduced Task Times with Copilot
Results were immediate. Skyeler Rivera, Director of Intake, describes how tasks that once took an hour can now be done in as little as 30 minutes using Copilot—“I almost feel like I’m cheating the system” (Intapp, SpliceNet Consulting, Microsoft). Routine deliverables, drafting standard operating procedures, and document edits are now faster and more consistent.
b) Real‑Time Collaboration via SharePoint
Document sharing among paralegals and attorneys is now conducted directly in SharePoint, eliminating the inefficiencies of emailing multiple file versions. Real‑time co‑authoring reduces errors and accelerates workflows (Microsoft). External parties—opposing counsel or courts—also collaborate through SharePoint securely, replacing insecure third‑party tools like Dropbox.
c) Fewer IT Support Calls
Since moving from on‑premises Citrix servers to the cloud, support tickets have dropped noticeably. The firm’s HR Director, Leslie Fry, says collaboration is now frictionless and uptime is improved—boosting overall employee satisfaction (Microsoft).
d) Elevated Employee Experience
Rivera emphasizes that employees are “much happier now that we are using Microsoft 365.” The new tools empower staff to complete tasks more efficiently, reduce repetitive work, and focus on matters that matter—serving clients (Microsoft).
e) Strategic Use Cases for Copilot
Madison McAnn, Director of Operations, describes how she uses Copilot to summarize work, clean up job‑description redundancies, and locate internal documents within SharePoint. They’re planning to embed Copilot into onboarding and training modules to help new hires locate internal resources quickly—further reducing time to full productivity (Microsoft).
Broader Benefits of Microsoft 365 for Law Firms
Disparti is leading the industry across the U.S. and abroad by leveraging Microsoft 365 to modernize operations and gain competitive advantage.
- Microsoft Teams, when structured with channels per practice area or office, centralizes communication, cuts email clutter, and integrates seamlessly with SharePoint, OneNote, Planner, and Outlook—all accessible via one hub (SpliceNet Consulting, LexWorkplace).
- SharePoint and OneDrive simplify document management, version control, access permissions, and compliance—all essential for protecting sensitive legal information (Integris).
- Security and Governance Tools, such as Data Loss Prevention, eDiscovery, Double Key Encryption, and advanced compliance policies, ensure sensitive client data stays protected even while enabling productivity (TECHCOMMUNITY.MICROSOFT.COM).
- AI‑powered capabilities through Copilot accelerate drafting, summarization, case research, and workflow automation—helping attorneys and staff focus on strategic client outcomes rather than repetitive internal tasks (Integris).
Lessons Learned & Best Practices for Law Firms
From Disparti’s experience, here are some actionable takeaways for firms considering a similar transformation:
- Plan migration thoughtfully: move documents into SharePoint with proper folder structure, tagging, and permissions to enable later AI effectiveness.
- Train staff early and often: encourage use of Teams, SharePoint, OneNote, and Copilot. Provide use cases—like intake drafting, policy updates, or SOP generation—and reinforce through training.
- Build internal AI champions: Rivera and McAnn serve as Copilot advocates—spotlighting successes encourages wider adoption.
- Layer on automation: use Power Automate and Planner to automate intake workflows, approvals, reminders, and case management.
- Ensure strong governance: deploy DLP, MFA, retention and encryption controls to meet regulatory and ethical obligations.
- Iterate and scale: document what got faster, gather user feedback, and expand usage of Copilot into additional departments like HR, operations, marketing.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Legal AI at Disparti
As they scale, Disparti Law Group intends to expand Copilot use across more functions—especially in intake and claims processing—so that staff can handle cases more quickly, accurately, and autonomously. Rivera envisions Copilot enabling intake specialists to process claims without constant director supervision, drawing on content from handbooks, emails, and case files—all powered by the firm’s centralized, cloud‑based digital estate (Microsoft).
Meanwhile, operations teams plan to embed Copilot into training modules, creating AI‑driven resource guides and searchable knowledge bases to onboard new staff faster and more effectively.
Disparti Law Group’s journey underscores a powerful truth: embracing Microsoft 365 and Copilot is not merely a technology upgrade, but a client-serving transformation. By modernizing infrastructure, standardizing document processes, automating routine tasks, and deploying generative AI capabilities securely, Disparti has accelerated workflows, elevated employee experience, and, most importantly, enhanced service delivery for clients.
As Microsoft aptly summarized in their July 2025 case study: Disparti’s move to M365 and Copilot has delivered measurable improvements—documents edited faster, IT calls reduced, collaboration simplified—and most crucially, efficiency reallocated to the firm’s mission of helping people recover and rebuild (Microsoft).
For law firms ready to compete, scale, and serve clients better, the blueprint is now clear: leverage cloud productivity, empower staff with AI, and uphold security. Disparti Law Group shows what’s possible—when technology aligns with mission
For full details, refer to Microsoft’s customer story: “Disparti Law Group uses Microsoft 365 and Copilot to serve clients faster” (published July 7, 2025) (Microsoft).